The theoretical approach I have chosen is constructivist theory
where in its broadest description
“… is the theory that
humans generate knowledge and meaning from an interaction between their
experiences and their ideas” (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Constructivism_%28learning_theory%29).
I have found this theory useful as it recognises that the
learner brings capacity, that the learner constructs meaning through
experience, and that interaction plays a key part in developing ideas.
However, given that the majority of students that I teach
are generally novices to not only Social Anthropology but also to Occupational
Therapy, my application of constructivist theory also has a caveat with it in
that I have developed some set guidelines to help students work through this course.
I provide support structures in class and via Moodle to offer a framework for
their thinking as they begin to explore SA. Some of these structures are quite set and
they step students through a certain activity- with the aim of the students
participating more independently towards the end of the course.
Criticisms of a purely constructivist approach for novice
learners have claimed that teaching/learning should encourage “…cognitive activity rather than behavioural
activity, instructional guidance rather than pure discovery, and curricular
focus rather than unstructured exploration”. (Meyer, 2004 P.14). Meyer goes on to argue
that it is important to focus on theory-based research which explains how people learn (Meyer, 2004. P.18). Recently,
there has been some in-depth research looking at this theme of best evidence
(in determining positive learning outcomes for students) within a New Zealand
context in the compulsory education sector.
One particular piece of influential
research has been the ‘Best Evidence Synthesis’ by Timperley, Wilson, Barrar
and Fung (2007) and ‘Te Kotahitanga’ by
Bishop, Berryman, Cavanagh and Teddy (2009) which focuses on the educational
disparities faced by Māori. These both have had a major influence and provide the
backbone of recent education policy changes developed by the Ministry of
Education including ‘Ka Hikitia’
and also the redevelopment of the Pasifika Education Plan.
A key outcome from Bishop’s work is the focus on the
relationship between teacher and student and how this directly impacts on
learning outcomes for students. Although this research is within the compulsory
sector, the demand for quality relationships between students and
‘lectures/facilitators’ and how this determines education outcomes will also be
a challenge for the post-compulsory sector. The post-compulsory sector will
have to think of innovative ways to realise this and blended learning certainly plays
a part in addressing this, as well as understanding the learning needs of
students and facilitators in a
post-compulsory setting.
No comments:
Post a Comment